philosophy of total hip replacement revision at Mayo Clinic

Background: Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) rates are increasing, with instability, aseptic loosening, and infection identified as primary indications for surgery. Managing significant acetabular and femoral bone loss remains a complex challenge, requiring standardized classification systems to guide reconstruction strategies.

Objective: This article reviews current surgical protocols and clinical outcomes for complex THA revisions, specifically focusing on the management of bone defects and periprosthetic fractures using techniques employed at the Mayo Clinic.

Key Points: Preoperative evaluation must prioritize the exclusion of infection via inflammatory markers and joint aspiration. Acetabular reconstructions are categorized by the Paprosky classification; Type 3 defects often necessitate jumbo cups, porous tantalum augments, or custom triflange implants to achieve stability. In cases of pelvic discontinuity, tantalum cup-cage constructs or distraction techniques are utilized, showing high short-term survival despite risks of stress fractures or reduced bone stock. Femoral revisions utilize modular fluted tapered stems (TMFT) for Paprosky Type 3 and 4 defects, providing superior axial and longitudinal stability compared to cemented options. Extended lateral femoral osteotomy is frequently employed to facilitate component removal. Periprosthetic fractures are managed according to the Vancouver classification, with stable stems treated via internal fixation and loose stems requiring TMFT or proximal femoral replacement.

Conclusion: Successful THA revision relies on meticulous preoperative planning and the selection of implants that ensure osseointegration and mechanical stability. The shift toward porous metal technology and modular femoral components has improved outcomes in cases of severe bone deficiency.